<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Searching For The Future of Photography At The 2009 Consumer Electronics Show</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pixsylated.com/2009/01/searching-future-of-photography-2009-consumer-electronics-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pixsylated.com/2009/01/searching-future-of-photography-2009-consumer-electronics-show/</link>
	<description>Insights on Digital Photography, Canon Flash, Shooting Tethered, Color Management, Lightroom Workflow</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 05:19:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arpad Daniel Ronaszegi</title>
		<link>http://pixsylated.com/2009/01/searching-future-of-photography-2009-consumer-electronics-show/comment-page-1/#comment-1434</link>
		<dc:creator>Arpad Daniel Ronaszegi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pixsylated.com/?p=1004#comment-1434</guid>
		<description>Syl,

Thank you for the thorough report on some of the highlights of the electronics show - lots of exciting development and inspiring new ideas. One thought on 3d: Being also an architect and in a profession that is three dimensional in its essence, I still find that in some cases a two-dimensional representation can be more informative and useful to convey an idea (and I am not thinking of plans as much as concept diagram or analyses of ideas...). It is exciting to see what 3d photography has for us, yet can it be that there is some similarity in photography to sitting down with a book vs. watching a screen where the former still has a depth and meaning that the latter cannot provide?
Looking forward to your next report!

Arpad</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Syl,</p>
<p>Thank you for the thorough report on some of the highlights of the electronics show &#8211; lots of exciting development and inspiring new ideas. One thought on 3d: Being also an architect and in a profession that is three dimensional in its essence, I still find that in some cases a two-dimensional representation can be more informative and useful to convey an idea (and I am not thinking of plans as much as concept diagram or analyses of ideas&#8230;). It is exciting to see what 3d photography has for us, yet can it be that there is some similarity in photography to sitting down with a book vs. watching a screen where the former still has a depth and meaning that the latter cannot provide?<br />
Looking forward to your next report!</p>
<p>Arpad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
